Understanding Children's Development has proved to be an extremely useful book within the area of psychology and how children develop ideas around gender. The book talks in great detail about the types of psychological experiments, models of human development and specific theories about the development of gender which are key to my studies.
Types of experiments -
Cross-sectional design: In a cross-sectional design, an investigator might look at several age groups simultaneously. For example, she might record language ability in 3-year-olds and 4-year-olds, at the same point in time. The cross-sectional design is quick to do, and is appropriate if the main interest is in what abilities or behaviours are typical at certain ages. Because of the convenience in this method, the majority of developmental studies have been cross-sectional.
Longitudinal design: In a longitudinal design, the investigator follows certain individuals over a given time period, measuring change. For example, our investigator might have recorded the language ability for a sample of 3-year-olds and a year later visited the same children to get a sample of what they can do as 4-year-olds. Longitudinal designs are generally preferable if the focus of interest is in the process of change, and the relationship between earlier and later behaviour.
Cohort design: Here, different cohorts (i.e. samples of children born in different years) are compared at the same ages. This design will inform us of the image of historical change. For example, if we compare the leisure activities of 8-year-old children born in a Western society in 1930, 1960 and 1990, we will see changes influence by (among other factors) the advent of television in the 1950s an and the widespread use of the internet and mobile phones in the 1990s.
Social Learning Theory -
The answer often seems to be that parents do behave differently towards boys and girls. Besides the cross-cultural evidence referred to above, observations have been made in homes and nurseries in Western Societies. For example, Fagot (1978) studied children aged 20-24 months in American homes. She found that girls were encouraged by their parents to dance, dress up, follow them around and play with dolls, but were discouraged from jumping and climbing; boys, however, were encouraged to play with blocks and trucks but discouraged from playing with dolls or seeking help.
Cognitive Development Theory -
Children tend to imitate same-sex models and follow sex-appropriate activities, because they realise that this is what a child of their own sex usually does. This process was termed self-socialisation by Maccoby and Jacklin (1974), since it does not depend directly on external reinforcement.
What evidence is there for this cognitive-developmental view? In a number of studies, the development of gender identity and constancy has been found to correlate with the degree of sex-typed behaviour. For example, in a study of 2- and 3-year-olds by Weinraub et al. (1984), it was found that the children who had achieved gender identity more securely were also the ones who were observed to make more sex-stereotyped toy preferences. In another study of 4-6-year-olds (Ruble et al., 1981), the level of gender constancy was measured, and each child was shown a film of either same- or opposite-sex children playing with a new toy. Only children high on gender constancy were influenced by the film; if a child high on gender constancy saw opposite-sex children playing with the toy, that child avoided playing with it subsequently.
Social Cognitive Theory -
Social cognitive theory (Bussey & Bandura, 1999) in effect draws together the ideas of social learning theory and the cognitive developmental and gender schema insights; which, after all are complementary rather than antagonistic. Social cognitive theorists stress the variety and complexity of mechanisms that are at work - for example:
Self-regulatory mechanisms - children monitor their own behaviour with reference to a self-accepted standard of what is appropriate
Identification with a peer group - monitoring their behaviour in relation to how they expect same-sex peers might react.
Motivational mechanisms - children are most likely to imitate behaviour that they think they can master and that will enhance their self-efficacy and self-esteem.